<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ESCOZ Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://escoz.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://escoz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is MonoTouch dead? by Apple</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/is-monotouch-dead/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=336#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>If monotouch, don&#039;t know wheather they will be banned or not

why don&#039;t they reduce the cost of the license at least.

no body will pay 400 us dollar for that risk

reduce the cost since it has high risk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If monotouch, don&#8217;t know wheather they will be banned or not</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t they reduce the cost of the license at least.</p>
<p>no body will pay 400 us dollar for that risk</p>
<p>reduce the cost since it has high risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Displaying web images with MonoTouch &#8211; UIWebImageView by Alexander Viken</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-displaying-web-images/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Viken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/blog/?p=89#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>I get the same error. 

Just downloaded the sourcecode and added the UIWebImageView Class to my project but get the &quot;Cannot cast from source type to destination type&quot; when i call .DownloadImage(url)

Any idea on how to get it to work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the same error. </p>
<p>Just downloaded the sourcecode and added the UIWebImageView Class to my project but get the &#8220;Cannot cast from source type to destination type&#8221; when i call .DownloadImage(url)</p>
<p>Any idea on how to get it to work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MonoTouch is alive and doing well by ESCOZ</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-is-alive/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>ESCOZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=355#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Great to hear about RPS, Manniat. I have also released an update to Cracklytics, that was accepted with no problems by Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear about RPS, Manniat. I have also released an update to Cracklytics, that was accepted with no problems by Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MonoTouch is alive and doing well by Manniat</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-is-alive/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Manniat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=355#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>I totally agree - yesterday RPS made it&#039;s way to the appstore (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/rpsf/id380854636?mt=8)
Universal, iAd, Gamekit, Facebook integration - and of course done with MT :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree &#8211; yesterday RPS made it&#8217;s way to the appstore (<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/rpsf/id380854636?mt=8" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/rpsf/id380854636?mt=8</a>)<br />
Universal, iAd, Gamekit, Facebook integration &#8211; and of course done with MT <img src='http://escoz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is MonoTouch dead? by ESCOZ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MonoTouch is alive and doing well</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/is-monotouch-dead/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>ESCOZ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MonoTouch is alive and doing well</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=336#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010, Apple changed some rules that made it look like MonoTouch was seeing the last of its days. I documented it here. After all this time, it feels like its important now to write about the updates since then to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010, Apple changed some rules that made it look like MonoTouch was seeing the last of its days. I documented it here. After all this time, it feels like its important now to write about the updates since then to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MonoTouch is alive and doing well by MonoTouch.Info</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-is-alive/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>MonoTouch.Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=355#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MonoTouch is alive and doing well...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this entry - Trackback from MonoTouch.Info...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MonoTouch is alive and doing well&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this entry &#8211; Trackback from MonoTouch.Info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MonoTouch Calendar control is here! by Falk</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-calendar-control-is-here/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/blog/?p=186#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>I used the code and with some individual changes it works great.

Thanks for your effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the code and with some individual changes it works great.</p>
<p>Thanks for your effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monotouch tip: Inherit UIViews ALL the time! by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/monotouch-tip-inherit-uiviews-all-the-time/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/blog/?p=130#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Any chance of a sample project (as offered)? I&#039;m finding it a little difficult to follow the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of a sample project (as offered)? I&#8217;m finding it a little difficult to follow the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cracklytics 2.0 is out! by Michael Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/cracklytics-2-0-is-out/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=333#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>So, I was browsing the App store on my phone, and I have to say your app looked perfect.

But - and I really don&#039;t like complaining - but I can&#039;t seem to login. It&#039;s getting a touch tiresome at this point because I&#039;ve tried entering the password around twenty times now.

I considered the (VERY) distinct possibility that I mistyped that I mistyped; as a LastPass generated password, I had to look it up and it ain&#039;t easy to type. 

But I managed to login online fine (on he iPhone, to the Goigle Analytics website) after a couple tries, so now I&#039;m wondering if it&#039;s something to do with the app.

It&#039;s a 16-digit password with letters, numbers, and special characters. Is there the vague possibility your login procedure could be choking on it?

I&#039;ll continue to try the password when I have a free moment (at least I&#039;l probably have it memorized after this), and if I get in I&#039;ll let you know. When I get back to a computer.

Thanks,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I was browsing the App store on my phone, and I have to say your app looked perfect.</p>
<p>But &#8211; and I really don&#8217;t like complaining &#8211; but I can&#8217;t seem to login. It&#8217;s getting a touch tiresome at this point because I&#8217;ve tried entering the password around twenty times now.</p>
<p>I considered the (VERY) distinct possibility that I mistyped that I mistyped; as a LastPass generated password, I had to look it up and it ain&#8217;t easy to type. </p>
<p>But I managed to login online fine (on he iPhone, to the Goigle Analytics website) after a couple tries, so now I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s something to do with the app.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a 16-digit password with letters, numbers, and special characters. Is there the vague possibility your login procedure could be choking on it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll continue to try the password when I have a free moment (at least I&#8217;l probably have it memorized after this), and if I get in I&#8217;ll let you know. When I get back to a computer.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is MonoTouch dead? by Jeff A.</title>
		<link>http://escoz.com/is-monotouch-dead/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 05:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escoz.com/?p=336#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>I think its absolutely ridiculous the way Apple is treating this agreement. Legally speaking Apple has violated the terms of its own agreement which raises questions of whether or not this agreement has any legal bearing in court with regards to this section. Apple should amend the document and allow third party tools like MonoTouch be created to allow more apps from more developers on the iphone. Apple is ruining its chance to make that 2% profit from their app store. (They say the other 28% goes to operating costs)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its absolutely ridiculous the way Apple is treating this agreement. Legally speaking Apple has violated the terms of its own agreement which raises questions of whether or not this agreement has any legal bearing in court with regards to this section. Apple should amend the document and allow third party tools like MonoTouch be created to allow more apps from more developers on the iphone. Apple is ruining its chance to make that 2% profit from their app store. (They say the other 28% goes to operating costs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
